A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 640]

1. On February 1, 2008, the Defendant, at the D office located in the Jung-Eup Si, Jung-si, the victim E company director F, who is not an issue, shall be paid under the name of the transaction price since the bill is not an issue.

‘G Promissory notes' have been dryed in terms of the amount of KRW 53,010,00,000 which has been supplied for the past, as the price for the transaction of goods in the amount of KRW 53,01,00.

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to repay the obligation of the Promissory Notes, such as the promise, in the state that (ju) the Defendant was unable to repay the previous obligation by lending the financing bill from (ju) Paint, and on June 11, 2007, the Defendant or (ju) Paint did not have any intention or ability to repay the obligation of the Promissory Notes, such as the promise.

On the same day, the Defendant, by deceiving the above F, acquired financial benefits by receiving deferred payment of goods payment obligations from the victim E company on the same day.

2. On September 10, 2008, the Defendant demanded the representative director I of the victim H to pay the purchase price of KRW 58,321,253 from the D office located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City of Jung-gu on September 10, 2008 to pay the purchase price of KRW 58,321,253.

"At the same time, the number of units per unit (J) of the issuance of a high-end letter is 8 million won per face value of the issuance of a high-end letter as a price for goods.

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to repay the obligation of the Promissory Notes, such as the promise, in the state that (ju) the Defendant was unable to repay the previous obligation by lending the financing bill from (ju) Paint, and on June 11, 2007, the Defendant or (ju) Paint did not have any intention or ability to repay the obligation of the Promissory Notes, such as the promise.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the above K, deferred the payment of goods payment obligation from the victim H on the same day, by deceiving the above K, and thereafter, extended four times as shown in the list of crimes in attached Form No. 13, 2009.