A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, around 2003, is a person with bad credit standing who operates the CC, a company selling meat, as a person with bad credit standing who did not settle an amount equivalent to KRW 40 million.

On October 10, 201, in order to raise the successful bid price by October 10, 201, the date of the outstanding payment of the successful bid price, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that the Victim D, who was awarded real estate at the District District Court of the Republic of Korea, tried to acquire and acquire the share sheet from the Victim D, by deceiving the Victim as if he had a cash discount within the cover of the above share sheet, with the knowledge of the fact that the Victim D would promptly discount 50,000 won per share (F) of the issuance of the same E in cash.

On October 6, 2011, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s office located in Incheon City City City, concluded that “The Defendant would make a check of the number of units in cash if the Defendant sold the imported hydrogen in accordance with the victim’s above statement of number of units because of rapid circulation of the imported hydrogen to be handled in the Republic of Korea,” and that “The Defendant would purchase the imported hydrogen in the cost with the above statement of number of units, and then would make it possible for the Defendant to pay a discount fee if he sold it.” The Defendant would not pay a discount fee if he purchased the imported hydrogen in the cost. The Defendant would purchase the imported hydrogen in the form of the above statement of number of units, on the face of the week in which the said statement of number of units is made, and would purchase the imported hydrogen in the form of the number of units, and then create 50,00

However, even if the defendant received the above check of the number of shares from the victim, he purchased the import source with the corresponding check of the number of shares, and sold it and paid it by the agreed date in cash, and as well, he thought that the above check of the number of shares issued as above was used for personal purposes, such as company operating expenses, etc.

On October 6, 2010, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a copy of KRW 50,000 per share of the E issuance on October 6, 2010 from the victim, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A copy of the number of units;