logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.02.20 2013고정1123
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 High Court 1123"

1. At around 23:10 on October 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven D vehicles owned in Heungdong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-dong, and (b) led to the defluent state of blood alcohol concentration in the main state in which the blood alcohol concentration was not flowed, and speeded at the speed of the Si speed on the two-lanes of the Do.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, and shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that impedes and impedes others according to the road conditions and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has the duty of care to report the traffic situation at the right and right and right and to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant left behind the vehicle behind the Defendant, he shocked the fronter of the F parked by E, which was parked in the fronter of the above vehicle of the Defendant, with the rearer of the above vehicle of the Defendant, and the fronter of H parked by G parked in the front direction while being pushed ahead of the above vehicle and parked in the front direction of the vehicle of E.

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, damages C’s repair cost of vehicles, KRW 727,096, E’s repair cost of vehicles, KRW 2,959,359, and KRW 358,926 of the G vehicle repair cost, and did not comply with the police’s request for a alcohol test without justifiable grounds.

"2013 Highly 1125"

2. On October 29, 2013, around 23:10 on October 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered the amount equivalent to KRW 7,500,00 in the market price of the victim I (Nam, 42 years old); and (b) opened an unrecepted driver’s seat; and (c) driven by putting the vehicle under the jurisdiction of the vehicle with the motor vehicle key located in the vehicle and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of some police officers against the defendant;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Each statement of I, E, and G Preparation 1.

arrow