1. Of the instant lawsuit, each point of the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 is indicated in the attached Form among the 212 square meters of Gyeonggi-gun D 212 square meters.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 22, 2009, the Plaintiff, which was owned by the Defendant, received a sale by compulsory auction as to the buildings, including the instant land and the instant land and the instant land and the Simenb block string roof, one-story neighborhood living facilities, housing, etc. constructed on H, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on July 22, 2009. The Plaintiff, who was owned by the Defendant, received a sale by compulsory auction and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 11, 2014 with respect to E large scale 80 square meters (hereinafter “instant land 2”) and F large scale 36 square meters (hereinafter “instant third land”).

B. Around July 4, 1979, the Defendant newly constructed a 43 square meter on the instant land No. 2. The said housing was built on the land No. 2 of this case, and prior to the sale of the instant land No. 2, 3, 4, and 1 as a result of the compulsory auction due to the extension of the said housing, the part (A) in the ship (hereinafter “the instant part”) connected each of the items in sequence among the instant land No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 (hereinafter “instant part”) attached to the land No. 1 of this case, which was connected in order to each of the items in (a) of the instant land.

(2) On board the ship (B) which connects each point of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 3 of the same drawings on the land No. 2 of this case to each point of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 3 of the same map indication on the land No. 2 of this case, the part (c) which connects each point of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 8 of the same map indication on the land No. 3 of this case, and the part (c) which connects each point of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 8 of the same map indication on the land No. 3 of this case.

[C] The Plaintiff is composed of the following: (a) the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the delivery of the instant part of the instant part among the instant part of the housing and the removal of its ground and the transfer of the said part of the instant part of the land, and for the payment of unjust enrichment equivalent to the land rent for the said part of the instant part of the land (A) (hereinafter “former lawsuit”).

d.

On November 4, 2014, when the above lawsuit was pending, the following co-ordination provisions between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.