The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant was found to have committed a crime in the first instance and against all of the judgment, and that the Defendant did not have the same criminal record and did not have any criminal record exceeding the suspended sentence, etc. are considered in favor of the sentencing.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant was able to pay the principal payment within the payment period but did not pay the victim's debt, the recovery of damage, or the failure to agree with the victim, the lower court determined the punishment within the scope of the recommended sentence guidelines, and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant's age, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too large.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.