The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized the crime and reflects the crime, and that it appears to be suffering from the usual depression, etc., there are extenuating circumstances in favor of sentencing.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant had been sentenced several times of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period due to the same crime, and other various sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the fact that the lower court has determined the sentence within the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (from August to January 6), it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.