logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.10.01 2013고단1465
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving one ton cargo vehicle B as his duties.

On June 4, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 20:30, while driving the vehicle, and led to the course of the intersection of 1849-7, Sinsi-dong 1849-7 from the direction of the Sinan Authority to the direction of the mountain.

In this case, the defendant, who is engaged in driving service, has a signal apparatus installed and has a crosswalk, so there was a duty of care to live well on the front side and the right and the right and the right, and to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the victim C (4 years old and south) who was a victim C, who was standing a crosswalk from the right side of the above vehicle, to the left side of the vehicle, in accordance with the Mad pedestrian pedestrian signals due to negligence bypassing the stop signal as it is.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence during approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, i.e., “f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., c

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2), a traffic accident report, an accident-related photograph, a medical certificate, and a signal cycle tag;

1. Application of statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc.;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is committed in light of the method and result, etc., and there are no criminal records against the defendant, and there are no significant changes in the damage caused by the vehicle operated by the defendant at the time of the traffic accident in this case.

arrow