1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is a company that runs urban bus transportation business with approximately five hundred full-time workers established on July 1, 2004 and employs approximately five hundred full-time workers.

On July 1, 2004, the Plaintiff joined the Intervenor company and served as an urban bus driver of 500 times at the seat number office.

B. On May 31, 2013, the Intervenor Company held a disciplinary committee to decide on 20 days of suspension from office on the grounds of the following misconduct, and decided on 20 days of suspension from office on June 20, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant disposition of suspension from office”). Disciplinary action notice of suspension from office: 20 days of suspension from office was a person who operates an urban bus No. 500, and on May 6, 2013, the Plaintiff violated the Passenger Transport Service Act by voluntarily operating the bus without operating the normal bus route at the time of departure from the garage, and by voluntarily operating the bus to the left left.

(2) On May 14, 2013, Seoul Special Metropolitan City filed a civil petition with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City on May 14, 2013, and on May 29, 2013, 2013, 2007, 200: (a) the head of the operation team, who is a senior officer on May 13, 2013, and the telephone communications with the Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant misconduct”); (b) the head of the operation team and the head of the personnel committee, who is a senior officer, would file a civil petition against the Intervenor, who is working at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant misconduct”); and (c) voluntarily signed the civil petition against the Intervenor, who is working at the place of business by 04:0 through 06:00; and (d) on May 29, 2013, who was referred to the personnel committee for the same reason, submitted the same “Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the personnel committee for the public order.” (c) The Intervenor’s misconduct and the Intervenor’s order.