1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. On May 1, 201, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) and served in the production team, and transferred the product to the quality control team on April 1, 2013.

B. On September 14, 2015, the Intervenor Company notified the Plaintiff of the attendance at the personnel committee scheduled to be held on September 17, 2015 on the ground that “the Plaintiff resisted the official discipline and resisted the official order of his superior official.”

On September 17, 2015, the Plaintiff appeared and explained at the personnel committee held by the Intervenor company.

C. On September 17, 2015, the Intervenor Personnel Committee (hereinafter “instant Personnel Committee”) decided to take one-month disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, i.e., suspension from office (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s disciplinary action, as indicated below, falls under Articles 51(3) and 52(3) of the Rules of Employment of the Intervenor Company, and notified the Plaintiff thereof on October 16, 2015.

(1) On June 22, 2015, the Plaintiff was re-commissioned to the quality control team and ordered the head of the quality control team to work on the 4th and 3th floor of the quality control team, but the Plaintiff rejected the order and worked on the first floor table of the quality control team.

② The Plaintiff was ordered by the head of the quality control team to submit a weekly Lart in accordance with the education plan, but rejected and delayed several times, and submitted Larts. Such submitted Larts also copied or copied work standards, etc. when the Plaintiff was transferred from the production team to the quality control team to receive education.

(B) The Plaintiff, who was subject to discipline, sent e-mail containing false facts, such as criticism against his superior and committing a criminal act by the general team, to the president of the Intervenor.

(hereinafter “instant Disciplinary Reason 2-1”). The Plaintiff is a trade union.