1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following portions 2.0, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Attached Form 1 of the first instance judgment

1. A statement of calculation of damages and a statement of calculation of damages in attached Form 2 shall be replaced by “attached Form of Calculation of damages” in this Court Decision.

B. Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance was reversed as follows.

1) Basic matters: The term “basic matters” in the attached Form of the damages calculation sheet shall be as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

C. Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance was 13 as follows.

6) Calculation: 380,301,023 won (the sum of the "actual income" in the attached Form for calculation of damages)

D. The fifth to twenty-one parts of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be completed as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

C. A future treatment cost of KRW 13,00,000 is required for the reduction of the human mission. If it is deemed that it was disbursed on July 27, 2019, following the date following the closing of argument in the first instance trial, it is KRW 10,832,90 when calculating the current price at the time of the accident.

However, since there is no evidence that the Plaintiff paid the above medical expenses by the date of the closing of argument in the court of first instance, the time to pay the above expenses shall be deemed to be March 28, 2020, which is the day following the date of the closing of argument in the court of first instance recognized by the court of first instance, rather than July 27, 2019, which is the day following the date of the closing of argument in the court of first instance. However, if such calculation is made, the active damages recognized by the court of first instance have decreased rather than that recognized by the court of first instance, which is contrary to the principle of prohibition of disadvantageous change in the instant case, in which only the Plaintiff appealed

A person shall be appointed.

E. The part of the 6th to 4th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be reversed as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

(d) The purchase cost of the auxiliary sewage assistive device shall be 250,000 won every three years, and it shall be from the date following the closing of argument in the first instance trial.