1. The part against Defendant B and D of the judgment of the court of first instance, which corresponds to the following amount ordered to be paid.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an attorney-at-law who served as the 18th National Assembly member and has contributed to a variety of broadcasting programs and been working as a broadcasting business operator.

B. On December 1, 2015, L media prepared an article with the same content as “O” (hereinafter “instant article”) in the title “O” in [M] A and N PPs, and provided it to the Internet portal site, and posted the article on its website.

The author's comments are the same as Defendant B's one.

왜 저러고 살까 진짜 한심한 인생이네 ㅉㅉ 가정교육 못 받고 자란 건 확실한 듯 피고 C T에서 말도 안 되는 억지 논리로 떼쓰고 성질부리면서 새누리당정권 쉴드쳐주는거 봤을 때 진심 띠꺼웠는데 쌤통이다.

Alley Dorara Dora

피고 D 완죤 또라이~~~~ 한국을 떠나세요~ ^^

The defendant G Nnico vagabonds do not seem to exist.

ㅉㅉ 피고 H 전형적인 소시오패스적 성향을 보이네 ㅎ 피고 I 부모님들, 애들 공부가 다가 아니에요.

If a person receives character education at home, it will be said.

Defendant J JA is not only the denial of contract.

애들이랑 자기 자식들 보기에 부끄럽지는 맙시다 좀!!! 피고 K 아직도 정신 못 차렸네. 부인은 보살인가.

C. The Defendants, on the same day, written comments on the instant article as follows.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion infringed on the Plaintiff’s personality right by preparing an insulting statement against the Plaintiff in relation to the article of this case. As such, the Defendants are liable to compensate for damages incurred to the Plaintiff’s emotional distress due to such tort, including KRW 2,00,000, and damages for delay.

B. Part 1 of the claim against Defendant B and D is limited to the freedom of expression and the protection of honor.