logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.05.09 2013고정264 (1)
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) on September 12, 2012, the Defendant damaged the property by reporting that the banner, which is the victim who disposed of the said banner reduction in a knife with a knife, was written against the suspicion of unfair spending of the management expenses for the apartment, which he raised at the entrance of the Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-si, Busan Metropolitan City, stating the details of the banner, and destroying the property equivalent to KRW 35,00,000, which is managed by the head of the said apartment management office D

2. On September 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) on September 12, 2012, the Defendant: (b) on September 22 and 10, 2012, the victim E (the age of 52) who had had a good appraisal before the same representative room located in the Yongsan-gu C Apartment Management Office in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; (c) divided the above apartment house 404 representative Flus; and (d) assaulted the victim by spreading hot coffee contained in the fluscing cup into the part above the part above the victim’s arms and drinking it twice.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. The defendant's legal statement (the tenth court date);

1. Report on occurrence of a crime that is to be caused by the damage to property (the second fact on the market);

1. The statements of witnesses E and F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on report of occurrence of violence;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 19:00 on September 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) went into the representative room for the same reason as the foregoing “A” in front of the Dong office located in the office of the management office in Yongsan-gu, Busan-si; (b) however, there was no door opening by the people in the above office; and (c) there was no door opening the door of the Dong office managed by the said D; and (d) caused property to be damaged by opening the Dong office door managed by the said D, the victim, so that the said D’s repair checks and checks can be carried out several times.

2. The facts charged are consistent with this part of the judgment.

arrow