Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 High 6] The Defendant requested to remove the banner installed near Pyeongtaek-si Station and requested it to the Pyeongtaek-si Office, but did not accept the Defendant’s demand;

1. On August 30, 2013, the Defendant, at the square of Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-dong, destroyed and damaged it well by taking advantage of the upper neck, which was previously possessed a string of a banner at the market price set up by the victim’s deaf end group of vehicles, at around 21:30, the Defendant:

2. At around 04:00 on August 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) destroyed and damaged a banner installed by the Democratic Party of the Victim’s Democratic Party in each city at each city; and (b) destroyed and damaged a banner installed by the victim’s labor party using a blick line in advance, which was possessed by the victim’s labor party; and

3. On September 8, 2013, at around 14:20, the Defendant destroyed it well by taking advantage of the upper limit that the victim labor party established at the square for the above Manung Station, had two strings of banners in the market price, which was installed.

On February 24, 2014, from around 10:30 to 10:45 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s management office’s management of the said apartment for about 15 minutes by force, by avoiding disturbance, such as passing over a disturbance, such as passing over 15 minutes from the victim G apartment management office in Pyeongtaek-si Q, to the employees of the management office in charge of the victim’s name-free management such as the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[Attachment 2014 fixed6]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. AR and AS respective statements;

1. Report on occurrence of a crime that is to be caused by the damage to property (2014 high-level 220);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness G's statutory statement;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be acquitted;