Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives of B apartment units, and the victim C is the resident of the above apartment unit, and the defendant and the victim had a dispute over the rooftop waterproof construction works of the above apartment unit, while the defendant and the victim had a dispute over the above apartment rooftop waterproof construction works, the defendant arbitrarily opened the documents related to rooftop waterproof construction works sent to the victim who was in the front room of the above apartment building E-dong guard in Ansan-si, 199.
Accordingly, the defendant opened the sealed victim's document.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 316 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crime subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 318 of the Criminal Act.
C. After the prosecution of this case, the victim revoked the complaint (Submission on April 10, 2020)
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;