logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.05.30 2018고단266
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 17, 2015, the Defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on November 17, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the original prison on April 2, 2017.

Criminal facts

On March 9, 2018, the Defendant, at around 01:30, demanded that the “F main point” of the victim E’s operation on the primary city D, 1st underground, would normally pay the victim the amount as if the victim would normally pay, and that the Defendant would provide entertainment entertainment services more than three weeks each week.

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if the two owners and entertainment entertainment services are provided.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) provided the victim with entertainment entertainment services more than three parallel weeks in total equivalent to the market value of KRW 690,000 in the same place; and (c) provided the victim with entertainment entertainment services.

[Defendant B] 2018 Highest 268 [Defendant B, A]

1. Defendant B

A. On February 20, 2018, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (pacting type) by the J, who was dispatched after receiving a report on February 20, 2018, to the effect that, around 04:45 on February 20, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around 04:45, hereinafter referred to as “H restaurant”; and (b) around 112, hereinafter referred to as “ female customers not wish to take a bath,” and (c) committed assault by the J’s chest due to both hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

B. On February 20, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime at around 05:50 on February 20, 2018, in the original city, in the detention room of the original state police station, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties as stated in the above paragraph “A,” and was under the arrest of the police officer to enter the detention room. During the arrest of the flagrant offender, the Defendant assaulted the K’s left buckbucks one time to walk on the course of the launch.

Accordingly, the defendant is about the protection of the police officer.

arrow