Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On September 2010, the Defendant was married with B, a victim of Vietnam’s nationality, and lived together with the Defendant.
On December 14, 2014, at around 18:40 on December 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the victim’s head and face of the victim on a one-time basis, and on a one-time basis, on a one-time basis, on the part of the victim’s head and face, as a result of the fact that he gifts a cell phone to the wife residing in Vietnam in the dwelling plan in the Southern-west-gun, the Defendant committed assault.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant on May 20, 2015, which was after the institution of the instant prosecution. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.