Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of C who will make the necessary important persons in the main factory located in Gunsan-si B, and is in charge of C's affairs.

Any person discharging wastes from his/her place of business shall treat wastes generated from his/her place of business directly or by entrustment to a person who has obtained permission for his/her waste treatment business, a reporter of waste treatment, or

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in around February 1, 2012, at around 1, 2012, in the Gunsan City B, the fact was that the Defendant was a chemical shop located in the Y, which is a private person using luxic lux in the luxic luxic lux, a mixture of the waste luxic luxic luxic lux, which was discharged in C, and the chemical shop located in the luxic luxic lux in the luxic luxic luxic luxic lux, which was permitted to dispose of the waste luxic luxic luxic luxic lux in the luxic luxic luxic luxic lux, but could not be disposed of in the luxic luxic luxic luxic luxic lux.

From that time until September 9, 2015, the Defendant dealt with the environment of the same year without obtaining permission to dispose of the chemical dust of approximately KRW 3,757,120 g, in total, about 146 times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Investigation report (Report on the confirmation of the sex of the C closed main agent);

1. A certificate of collection of samples and results of analysis of samples;

1. Application of the statutes governing the entrustment disposal contract and the certificate of completion of a report on waste recycling;

1. Articles 65 subparag. 2 and 18 subparag. 1 of the former Waste Management Act (amended by Act No. 13038, Jan. 20, 2015) regarding criminal facts; the selection of fines (it is recognized that the Defendant operates a small-scale enterprise; the Defendant’s fault due to the site of the law is recognized; and the result of the Defendant’s test on the closed master shop from the Defendant’s factory.