logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.01.06 2015고단3155
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Crain cars.

On September 7, 2015, the Defendant driving the said car along the Jindo Intersection at the time of Pakistan around 01:15, while driving the said car at a speed of 65 km per hour, according to the three-lanes between the two-lanes of the court and the two-lanes from the Eup of the court.

Since there is an intersection where a signal is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to turn to the left at the left-hand turn.

Nevertheless, without neglecting this, the victim E (31) who was placed in the two-lanes of the right and left turn on the same side due to the negligence in the course of the duties in violation of the signal at the three-lanes of the right and left turn on the two-lanes of the two-lanes, the front part of the FSP car driven by the defendant was placed in the left side of the car driven by the defendant, and the above SPP car was placed on the left side of the road due to its shock.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as scam base, which requires treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, 7,450,287 won for repairing the said scam car, which is the ownership of the victim corporation, after the Defendant’s scambling, was destroyed to the extent that 2.1 million won for repairing the scam set owned by the victim at the time of the strike, and went away without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person, even though the scam was immediately stopped to the extent that the scam is damaged to the extent that it is possible.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on each traffic accident;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance specifications and a statement of computation of drid days;

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the point of escape after the injury or injury caused by duty), Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of non-measures after the injury or injury inflicted on duty) concerning the crime;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

arrow