logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.07.16 2015고단740
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 23, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam Branch, and on September 27, 2012, at the Ansan Branch of the Suwon District Court, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on July 1, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ansan Branch of the Suwon District Court.

On January 16, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license at around 22:18, driven a BN-si car at the front of the Korea Rural Community Corporation located in the king-dong of the Agricultural and Fishery Products Market at Ansan-si, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.062%.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and time as in the preceding paragraph, was asked to take a drinking test by exposing C while driving under influence on the road in front of the Korea Rural Community Corporation in front of the foregoing Korea Rural Community Corporation. The Defendant, while driving under influence without a license, was exposed to C while driving under the influence of alcohol, was conducted as if the Defendant himself/herself was his/her birthed D, and was demanded by C to write his/her statement of opinion in a written report on his/her driving under the influence of alcohol and sign his/her name on the driver’s name on the PDA terminal screen, and sign on the driver’s signature on which the notice of the result of the influence of drinking driving was entered.

For the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant stated “not to collect blood with water” in the “road condition report” column, “A driver” as “a person whose license was revoked and whose contents are identical to the facts.” However, the Defendant was notified that blood can be collected when recognizing and unfair as a result of the measurement.”

arrow