The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 15:00 on November 1, 2016, the Defendant, within the upper point of “D’s operation of the Victim C, located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, he left a room where the management of the victim E (19 Do, South) who is an employee, was neglected, and the Defendant carried 10,000 won of the market price that was placed in the display stand, and carried 1 prior to the entry into a room.

2. On November 3, 2016, around 14:49, the Defendant: (a) placed in the display stand at the said place at the said place; (b) placed 1,100,000 won of f1,000 won of f1,000 won of f1,000 won of f1,000 won of f1,000 won of f1,000 won of f1.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property amounting to 300,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (investigation into mental illness of a defendant);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the attraction of 100,000 won to a workhouse for a period converted into one day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the primary offender, the amount of damage is relatively minor, the agreement with the victim is reached, and the defendant seems to have committed the instant crime by contingency in a state of suffering from the emulculation of the middle class Do, etc.);