The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal - The lower court’s imprisonment (14 years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The summary of the Defendant’s assertion of special salvists (homicide) was possessed by the Defendant to ascertain whether the Defendant has sexual assault against the victim, and such facts were threatened with knife. The Defendant committed an contingent act while the victim salvbling the Defendant’s wife and body or salpinging the Defendant’s desire to salp, and salping the Defendant’s desire to salvbling it. As such, the scope of the recommended sentence set out in the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee for the sentencing of the Supreme Court Sentencing has been set up for the following reasons: (a) the scope of the recommended sentence set forth in the sentencing guidelines of the lower court [special salvists, mitigation factors - number of persons - planned homicide factors - planned homicide factors - the sentencing guidelines set forth in the sentencing guidelines of the lower court for each of the following reasons: (b) the Defendant’s punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than 10 years and 16 years after July 1, 2013.