The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of various sentencing conditions in the Defendant’s age, family environment, situation before and after the commission of the crime, etc., including the following: (a) the Defendant began to commit the instant thief within the period of repeated crimes, which did not go against the Defendant’s punishment; (b) the Defendant had been punished more than seven times in prison due to the instant thief and violent crimes; and (c) the Defendant repeatedly committed the crime without the awareness of the crime; and (d) the Defendant was unable to agree with the victims and did not take any particular measures to recover from damage; and (e) the Defendant’s punishment was too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.