The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments including the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, is not deemed unreasonable, on the grounds that the Defendant’s argument is groundless, given that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of during the period of suspension of execution; (b) the Defendant was unable to be sentenced to the sentence because of the current period of suspension of execution; (c) the same type of larceny criminal records and two times

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.