beta
Text
1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:
(a) Of the real estate listed in attached Form 1 List 1, the Attached Form 2 1, 2, 3, 4, 1.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. There is no dispute between the parties to the facts of recognition, or the following facts are acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3 and 6 (including the number of branch offices), the results of the measurement and appraisal commission to the Daejeon East Vice-Governor of the Daejeon National Land Information Corporation in this Court, as a result of the overall purport of the pleadings.
1) On April 14, 2010, the Plaintiffs are each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 owned by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant (hereinafter “each land of this case”).
(2) The term of the lease of the instant land was leased with the annual rent of KRW 3,00,000, and the term of the lease from April 14, 2010 to April 13, 2012 without the lease deposit, and renewed it. On April 2017, the term of the lease was determined as follows: (a) from May 1, 2017 to April 30, 2018; (b) the term of the lease was determined as follows: (c) the lessee leased each of the instant land, without the lease deposit; and (d) the lessee leased “the lessee shall remove all the facilities, such as the rains, on the land at the time of the termination of the contract” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant lease”).
(2) The Defendant received delivery of each of the instant lands from the Plaintiffs around the time of concluding the initial lease agreement, and had installed and operated the bridges by installing a vinyl yard, feed flag, manager, vehicle quarantine facilities, container, and vinyl. The location and size of each of the above facilities are as indicated in the attached Form 2.
3) The Defendant paid the Plaintiffs the annual rent under the instant lease agreement. From May 1, 2018, the period of the instant lease agreement expires, the Defendant continued to possess and use the facilities, such as a vinyl yard, etc. on each of the instant land, without paying the tea from May 1, 2018. (B) According to the above recognition facts, the instant lease agreement was terminated on April 30, 2018, and it agreed to remove all the facilities installed on each of the instant land due to the special terms and conditions of the said agreement. Thus, the Defendant agreed to the Plaintiffs on the termination of the instant lease agreement.