logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고단3565
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On August 15, 2017, around 03:10 on August 15, 2017, the Defendant came to turn to the left at the left while driving on the front side of E Hospital, which is located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, in two lanes (one-lane median bus lane) in front of the four-lane road.

Since there is a signal, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the following signals after checking whether there is a motor vehicle driving by well-rounding the front side and the left side and whether there is a person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim F (25) who was crossinged by driving the crosswalk without a pedestrian signal from the left side to the right side by driving the crosswalk without a pedestrian signal as it was by negligence, disregarding that the vehicle driving signal is a straight line, and found the victim to go beyond the floor by moving the victim's right side to the front part of the defendant's taxi.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., the victim, who was in need of approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines (the defendant caused the instant accident during the suspended execution period due to the same kind of crime, and the degree of violation of the defendant's duty of care, and the degree of injury of the victim is serious.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, the defendant's taxi is affiliated with the mutual aid association, and the defendant wishes to find the defendant's wife by agreement with the victim.

arrow