logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.23 2013나24686
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The grounds for the court’s explanation on this part of the parties’ assertion are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Therefore, it is reasonable to judge that the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not specifically agree on the performance or standard of the supplied goods in accordance with the supply contract of this case or the agreement of this case, and the Plaintiff appears to have agreed to load the goods to the Plaintiff after completing the ISO certification and quality inspection. The Defendant received ISO certification on December 4, 2008, and sent 5 samples to the Plaintiff around April 17, 2009 on 200, and then sent 200 if it was sent to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff sent 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000.

arrow