logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2020.10.08 2020고합91
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 20, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at Seoul High Court on October 25, 2018, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 25, 2018, and on August 29, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution on May 23, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a leader who has operated a system in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Unlike the general number system, the Defendant, at the beginning of the world, set the order of withdrawal of the fraternity, received monthly payment from the fraternity members in accordance with the distribution schedule that set the monthly payment from the fraternity, but, in the case of the remainder of the fraternity members, set the order of withdrawal in advance only to some fraternity members, and operated a large number of fraternitys in such a way as to pay the fraternity to the fraternity members when the fraternity members request the payment of the fraternity without setting the order of withdrawal in advance.

In around 2010, the Defendant had already been liable for financial rights amounting to 600 million won or more, and operated the system by the method of preventing a return, such as not only using the payment for the accounts of other accounts, but also using the payment for the accounts of other accounts, where the bad credit, which was not paid to the members of the accounts from around 2001 to around 2010, reaches approximately KRW 30 to KRW 4 billion, with the bad credit related to the operation of the accounts accumulated.

In addition, the defendant has a lot of guidance members who want to get a larger amount of guidance in order to reduce the number of guidances operated from around 2009 as the defendant suffered a loss due to guidance operations, but the total amount of guidances that reduced the number of guidances and the total amount of guidances that enter and exit is also reduced.

arrow