logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.09.05 2013노2120
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime, and his mistake is divided in depth, and the fact that the instant phiphone, which the Defendant was sealed, was discovered by a customs office and seized, and was not distributed domestically.

However, the crime of this case is that the defendant imported approximately 65.35 g of the instant phiphone, and the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the method and content of the crime. Narcotics-related crimes are serious social harm due to the toxicity of narcotics, etc., and in particular, narcotics-related crimes are highly likely to cause harm to the health and social safety of the people because they are classified into sale and purchase or medication, and thus require strict punishment, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, home environment, and various circumstances favorable to the defendant, and the scope of the sentencing guidelines for narcotics-related crimes in accordance with the sentencing guidelines for narcotics-related crimes falls under the basic area of category 2 among the "large-scale crimes" of the sentencing guidelines for the sentencing guidelines for the sentencing guidelines for narcotics-related crimes.

In full view of the fact that the lower court appears to have set the sentence by reasonably leaving the lower limit, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument cannot be accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow