All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each sentence (for defendant A: 5 years of imprisonment and confiscation, 3 years and 6 months of imprisonment and confiscation) declared by the court below to the defendants is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendants led to the confession of the instant crime by the Defendants in depth, and the Defendants appeared to have been aimed at passing through the Republic of Korea rather than distributing the instant phiphones in Korea, and that the instant phiphones imported by the Defendants were discovered in customs and seized in full.

However, the crime of this case is that the defendants imported approximately 6.24 km of the instant phiphone, and the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the method and content of the crime. Narcotics-related crimes are seriously harmful to society due to the toxicity of narcotics, etc., and in particular, the act of smuggling is committed by sale and purchase or medication, and thus, the risk of undermining the health and social safety of the people is very high. Therefore, strict punishment is required. Other factors of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendants' age, character and behavior, home environment, and various factors favorable to the defendants, and the court below falls under the basic area of category 3 among the "large-scale crimes" of the sentencing guidelines for narcotics-related crimes according to the sentencing guidelines for narcotics-related crimes, taking into account various favorable circumstances for the defendants, and thus, the scope of sentencing of recommendations is 8 to 1

In full view of the fact that the lower court seems to have set each sentence against the Defendants by reasonably leaving the lower limit, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the Defendants is too large.

Therefore, all defendants' arguments cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the judgment of the court below shall be made in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure.