logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.05 2019가단10000
동산인도 청구의 소
Text

1. Defendant D and E jointly deliver to the Plaintiff the movables listed in the separate sheet.

2. The plaintiff's defendant corporation.

Reasons

1. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant D and E

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act: Judgment based on the recommendation of confession;

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant F, Inc., asserting that Defendant F, without title, possessed the movables indicated in the separate sheet, and sought delivery of the said movables. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that Defendant F, Inc., occupies the movables indicated in the separate sheet.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant D and E is justified. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant F is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow