1. Defendant C shall deliver to the Plaintiff the movable property listed in the list (attached Form 1).

2. The plaintiff's defendant D.

1. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C

(a)the indication of the claim (attached Form 2);

(b) Judgment following based service by publication (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant D

A. Defendant D is obligated to deliver the said movable property to the Plaintiff, as the gist of the cause of the claim asserted by the Plaintiff occupies movable property indicated in the list of the Plaintiff’s ownership (attached Form 1).

B. Examining the written evidence Nos. 1 to 4, and 6 together with the overall purport of the pleadings, the movable property listed in the list (attached Form 1) can be recognized as the Plaintiff’s ownership.

However, in light of the fact that Defendant D’s statement on October 14, 2019 that “self-reliance was received KRW 5 million from Defendant C and returned the said movable property to Defendant C, and that it does not currently hold the said movable property,” at the first pleading date, it is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that Defendant D currently occupies the said movable solely with the above evidence or other evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The plaintiff's claim against the defendant D cannot be accepted.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C is justified, and the claim against Defendant D is dismissed.