A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 9, 2010, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) with a fine of KRW 1,50,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) in the support of the Daejeon District Court, Daejeon District Court, on June 10, 201, the above court issued a fine of KRW 4 million as an identical crime and issued a summary order of KRW 4 million on at least two occasions as a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions. On January 19, 2014, the Defendant driving a car owned by his/her own household from approximately 200 meters in the same section from the street in front of the Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seodong-gu, Seoul District Court.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the above Paragraph 1, was willing to produce an identification card to identify himself/herself by the slope E belonging to the Western-gu Police Station in the Western-gu, Western-si, the Defendant refused to use his/her driver’s license under the name of the Commissioner of the Chungcheongnam-gu Police Agency, who was in his/her possession, by presenting the driver’s license under the name of his/her own identification mark as if he/she was his/her identification mark.

3. On January 19, 2014, around 18:41, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document, and the uttering of a private document: (a) indicated “B” on the column of the statement in the Jeju Western-si Police Station D police box; (b) stated that the Defendant himself/herself was a student B; and (c) indicated the “B” on the column of the statement in the junish driver’s license report and the statement in the junish driver’s statement report; and (d) marked his/her name

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the report on the primary driver's initiative in B, which is a private document related to confirmation of facts, and the report on the actual state of the primary driver's identity.

As above, the Defendant continued to use the forged B’s report on the main driver’s launch, and the report on the statement on the status of the driver’s driver, which was known of the forgery, to the assistant E belonging to the Seodaemun-gu Police Station D police box, as if it was duly formed.

(i) the evidence;