logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고단2594
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months and fines for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, around 20:00 on July 15, 2013, operated a commercial sex dealing business establishment with four rooms and 50 square meters in the space of approximately 30 square meters in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul and operated a commercial sex dealing business establishment with the trade name of “D,” and employed employees B, etc., and had employees, such as E, who found the said business establishment receive 80,000 won for one hour as the price for commercial sex acts from customers, such as E, who found the said business establishment, and had employees, such as B, receive 80,000 won for the price for commercial sex acts and acquired 80,000 won out of the price.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

"2013 Highest 2979"

1. In order to perform massage operations, Defendant B obtained qualification certification from the Mayor/Do governor, but around 22:50 on October 10, 2013, Defendant A operated “D” on the F4th floor of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and Defendant B performed an act of massage by taking advantage of the fingers and fingers of 80,000 won from customers who found the above massage without obtaining qualification certification.

2. In order to conduct massage operations, Defendant A received qualification certification from the Mayor/Do governor, but around 22:50 on October 10, 2013, Defendant A’s operation “D” on the F4th floor of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul. Defendant A received 80,000 won from a customer who found the place without obtaining qualification certification as a massage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. A defendant of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic: Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Articles 91, 88, and 82 (1) of the Medical Service Act and Articles 88 and 82 (1) (Selection of Fine) of the Medical Service Act;

1. From among concurrent crimes (Defendant A), the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution.

arrow