logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.05.25 2016고단7061
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 26, 2016, at the Busan District Court No. 351, which was located in the Busan District Court, around 17:40, May 26, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act against Defendant B, No. 4179, May 26, 201.

On May 17, 2012, the above case was in violation of the Electronic Financial Transaction Act by taking over the access media such as passbook, cash card, security card, and password from the Defendant, who was known to the Busan Northern bank account (Account Number E) from the Defendant, and was in violation of the Busan Northern Bank Act. On May 17, 2012, the Defendant opened the above account at the Busan Bank and transferred the passbook, check card, etc. to B, and did not directly terminate the above account, and there was no other business account opened in the name of the Defendant at the Busan Bank outside the above account.

Nevertheless, the defendant was returned to the head of the Tong and the card of the prosecutor before the presiding judge in the trial of the above case.

To this end, currently this passbook can be kept and stored

The question “I have fulfilled their functions.”

The testimony is made, the testimony is made, the statement is made, the statement is made, and the statement is made at any time to address the facilities.

Ma Doz. Doz. Doz.

“I have made an example or terminated to the question “?”

3.5 Mesa Mesa Mesa Mesa Mesa Mesa

“The question at which the question was “,” is hot.

At present, the head of the Tong gave testimony that the rest of the head of the Tong would have been terminated at present.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. An investigation report (including a report on investigation 1, 2, 3, 4 each time);

1. Decision 2015 High Court Decision 4179 High Court Decision, 2015 High Court Decision 41942

1. Inquiries into the current status of Busan bank accounts;

1. A copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against F, A, or B (in the net time 14, 22, 23);

1. The trial protocol (three times) No. 4179 of 2015, 4179 (three times), dated 52;

arrow