A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 21, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.232% on the part of the Defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the front side of the two apartment in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, to the road of about 500 meters from the front side of the two apartment in Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, to the road of about 100 days in front of 100.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) and the Defendant of the Road Traffic Act were engaged in driving of C C C, and, around June 9, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car and driven it along the two-lane distance from the front line of the ballot box at the front line of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul to drive it.

Since a signal, etc. has been installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive the driver in accordance with the signals by reducing the speed and checking the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led the victim D (year 42) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the front of the car when it is difficult to drive the car normally due to the influence of alcohol as stated in the above paragraph 1, to the front part of the car operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, resulting in injury to the said victim and the said victim E (the age of 35), such as base salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, damaged the said victim’s D motor vehicle to the extent that the repair cost, such as replacement and maintenance of back pan-bomers.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate an automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a C C-W-man car that was not covered by mandatory insurance as described in the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The defendant;