1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On January 23, 2018, the Defendant interfering with his/her duties was under the influence of alcohol at the main point of “G” operated by the Victim F in Permanent Residence E on January 23, 2018, and was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant was under the influence of liquor tax.

” 라는 말을 듣고 화가 나 “ 개새끼야, 씹새끼야, 개 같은 년, 좆같은 년.” 이라고 큰 소리로 욕설을 하고, 옆 테이블에 앉아 있던 손님들에게 “ 씹할 새끼야, 개새끼들 아, 뭘 쳐다보냐.

“The victim’s main business operation was obstructed by force for about 15 minutes, including: (a) the victim’s hump with a large sound; and (b) the victim’s hump with a hump going beyond the hump to the hump and let the hump to the customers

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by the Defendant: (a) 1-A); and (b) 112-2 reported by the Defendant at the time and place specified in the above Paragraph 1-A; and (c) 1, the police officer of the Permanent Police Station H District of the Permanent Police Station called to the site, who was called to the site, for the police officer of the H District of the Permanent Police Station.

Viewing the word “,” and she saw that “I’s chests were used in the way that I’s chests were pushed down on the floor and continued drinking, as I’s cigarette butts on the table were put up on the floor, and continued to do so on drinking.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers who called up to 112 reports.

2. Defendant B, at the time and time set forth in the above paragraph 1-A, at the place, Defendant B, the husband, arrested the police officer of the H district police station H district, and tried to board the patrol vehicle from the police officer of the police station H district, and told the above I to the above I, who stated, “I sprink, sprink, sprink, sprink, and sprink,” and assaulted the above I’s face.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers who called up to 112 reports.

3. Defendant C’s Defendant C’s above Section 1-A.