logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.10.21 2014고단2481
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2014, at around 20:40, the Defendant: (a) took part in the road in front of the Seo-gu Da “D” restaurant located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu; (b) it was necessary for ordinary citizens to have the victim’s E (or 46 years of age); and (c) took part in the part of the victim’s head one time in the top of the victim’s head; and (d) took part in the part of the part of the victim’s right side of the left side and the part under the left side of the victim’s head one time in the top of the wooden stop, which is a dangerous object, led the victim to several times to take part in the part of the part of the victim’s right side, which goes beyond the floor for about six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of the police against the accused (two times, replacement);

1. Each damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is recognized that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (a favorable circumstance among the reasons for sentencing below) has been divided and reflected, and that the Defendant deposited KRW 3.5 million for the victim on October 17, 2014.

However, the crime of this case was committed in the atmosphere of a tree, which is a dangerous thing of the defendant, by means of covering the part of the victim's left side and the part above the left side, etc., and thereby causing serious danger to the crime itself. Furthermore, the defendant committed the crime of this case in this case without being aware of the fact that he had been punished several times due to the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violence, Injury, Violence, etc. in the past, etc., even though he had the record of punishment several times, and even if he did not recover from the full damage (the defendant deposited KRW 3.5 million for the victim on October 17, 2014). However, the fact that the defendant deposited 3.5 million won for the victim is seen above, but on the other hand, according to the Sentencing Report (Evidence No. 19, the evidence No. 19, the victim is the victim.

arrow