The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the punishment of the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. There are circumstances to consider, such as the fact that there are family members to support the defendant.

However, the defendant committed the crime of this case in the case of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) at the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam branch on April 30, 2010, since he had been sentenced to the two-year probation for six months, the probation period has not expired. The crime of this case is published in an advertisement informing the defendant of commercial sex acts on the Internet site, and one of the six officetelss was leased, and one of the five officetelss was used as a place for commercial sex acts, and the remaining five rooms were used as a place for commercial sex acts, and it is not good that the crime is not committed. Considering the above, considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation and family environment, the circumstances and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is excessively unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.