logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.23 2014가단5894
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,257,984 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from February 11, 2014 to January 23, 2015, and from January 24, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) On October 23, 2013, around 20:29, around October 23, 2013, in order to lapse the shooting distance of the Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, A is the B Benz vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) A driver was driving his vehicle and was going through the above shooting distance in the direction of the Gangseo-gu Office of Gangseo-gu, and Mad C is a D business taxi owned by the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff vehicle").

(ii) an accident in which the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle and the left-hand part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle conflict (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) while driving a vehicle in the direction of the mountain direction (the right-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle) in the direction of the mountain direction.

A. 2) A is a substitute driver who belongs to a joint driving company that is a substitute driving company, and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with a substitute driver who has caused an accident in the course of vicarious driving with a joint driving company.

B. 1) On the site of the instant accident, including the current state of the accident site and the signal system, both signals were installed in both directions of the driving of both vehicles at the intersection of ten-lane crossings for both the driving direction of the Defendant and the driving direction of the vehicle. On the direction direction of the Plaintiff’s driving direction, the straight line in the direction of the driving direction of the vehicle was operated in a way that the signal was changed to green signal immediately from red signal to yellow signal, and the straight direction signal in the direction of the Defendant’s driving direction of the vehicle was operated in a way that the red signal was changed to yellow signal again to red signal, and then changed to red signal again. 2) On the other hand, there is a stop line in both directions before entering the said intersection. Since the crosswalk begins to enter the intersection, the crosswalk is marked as a stop line at the intersection, and after the crosswalk begins to enter the intersection, the white line, which is an indication of the stop zone, is set up as a square at the edge of the intersection, see Article 8(2) [Attachment 6] of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Act.

arrow