logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.12.21 2015고단4597
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 16, 2015, the Defendant expressed a desire that “A victim E, a police officer belonging to the D District Unit of the Suwon Police Station D District, who had been dispatched after receiving a 112 report that “A victim E, a police officer belonging to the police station of the Suwon Police Station, has to grow off without any jurisdiction of the police, who is not under the jurisdiction of the police, has become aware of the law, such as the reporter, the healian, the Healian, the Healian, the Healian, the Healian, the Healian, and the same son, the law, or healian, the notification of the fact.”

After that, the Defendant openly insulting the victim of C et al. by stating that C had been in the front of the patrol place that “A was in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act,” “A victim’s refusal to notify the victim of the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act,” “I ambly, I do not know of the law, I do not know of the law.”

2. The Defendant committed an obstruction of performance of official duties with the victim F (the age of 43) who was a police officer belonging to the same district group called together with E at the above date, time, place, and place, attempted to restrain the Defendant from doing the above act, and escaped as they were by hand.

The Defendant committed assault, such as the Defendant’s frightening of the victim’s chest part by hand, and walking the victim’s abundance due to his own frightion and obstruction of the performance of official duties, by against the defect of arresting the victim as a suspect of obstruction of the performance of official duties.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties, and at the same time, the victim injured the victim about three weeks of medical treatment, such as sprinking the right part.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement of E and F;

1. A complaint;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.

arrow