Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 24, 2014, the Defendant altered a copy of a 10 million won fake receipt by inserting D’s “1” as “6” on the date of issuance of a 10 million won fake receipt issued by using a verification-type pen in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 202 Dong 302, and 302, the Defendant’s residence, for the purpose of uttering.

2. On October 30, 2014, the Defendant, at the time of the alteration, had the husband E of the Defendant’s husband E, use private documents that were altered by submitting to the public service center of the Suwon District Court 120 (source-dong) the above altered receipt to the public service center of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the competent division in charge of the instant case No. 2014 No. 2470 (No. 2014).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a criminal investigation report (Attachment to forwarding documents of the case), a copy of forwarding documents (No. 2015-188 of the Suwon Police Station of the Republic of Korea);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of altered private documents), Articles 234, 231, 34 (1), and 31 (1) (the point of exercising altered private documents) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. The defendant's alteration of the receipt submitted the above receipt to the court by the husband of the defendant who is not aware of the fact or the purpose of the event that the receipt was altered, so the defendant's alteration of the receipt was not established.

The argument is asserted.

The purpose of exercising document alteration means the purpose of using altered document as if it is a true document, and there is no active desire or conclusive perception, but there is an incomplete perception.