1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff who is against the defendant with an additional payment order.

1. Judgment on the ground of the plaintiff's claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion made an agreement with the Defendant on July 2013 on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant’s implied math from July 2013 to February 2014 on the low temperature warehouse operated by the Plaintiff; (b) the Defendant’s implied math is kept in custody on the low temperature warehouse operated by the Plaintiff; (c) the Defendant’s implied math cannot be kept together with the number of years, and thus, (d) the Plaintiff’s one warehouse that can keep 130,00 km today is used as a whole; and (e) the amount of storage fees is 26,00,000 won per 1 km (i.e., 130,000 won (= 130,000 x 200 won) and the Defendant’s implied 66,890 km amounted to 26,000,000 won after deducting the remainder of storage fees and delay damages therefrom.

B. Determination is made with the Defendant on July 2013, 2013, the Defendant’s implied Mayman kept in the Plaintiff’s low temperature warehouse from July 7, 2013 to February 2, 2014, and the Plaintiff agreed to receive storage fees at KRW 200 per 1km per mag. The Plaintiff’s implied 66,890km from July 2013 to February 2014 pursuant to the above agreement was kept in the Plaintiff’s warehouse. The Defendant taken out the above Myman on March 1, 2014 without dispute between the parties [the Defendant, from the first date of pleading of the first instance court of the instant case, made the Plaintiff make a statement on December 15, 2014 to have the Defendant keep the Defendant’s implied 66,890km, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the Defendant’s confession from the first instance court to the effect that the Defendant’s confession would have been revoked on March 26, 2015.