1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On September 23, 1971, the Plaintiff purchased D 18,962 square meters (hereinafter “the land in this case before the division”) from the Defendant’s deceased father C (hereinafter “the deceased”) prior to the division. The deceased died on August 28, 1995 without following the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer against the Plaintiff. The Defendant, as the deceased’s heir, succeeded solely to the deceased’s share on the land in this case before the division of inherited property, as indicated in the attached Table 1 list (the completion of the division and registration conversion is as indicated in the attached Table 2 list), the Defendant asserts that he is liable to implement the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land listed in the attached Table 1 list.

Therefore, in light of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff’s purchase of the instant land from the deceased before subdivision, first of all, the evidence Nos. 1-1 (Receipt) cannot be admitted as evidence because there is no evidence to acknowledge the authenticity, and the Plaintiff did not have paid taxes on the land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 to 3, i.e., the Plaintiff did not possess and manage most of the said land, and the Plaintiff instituted the instant lawsuit only after the lapse of about 40 years from the 1971 to the 1971 claiming that the Plaintiff purchased the land of this case, in view of the fact that: (a) the entries listed in the evidence No. 2-1 to 3 of the evidence No. 1 cannot be admitted as evidence; and (b) there is no evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, we cannot accept the plaintiff's above argument.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.