beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around September 3, 2019, the Defendant thief took a credit card (number : E) of a bank with which the market price of the victim’s ownership kept near the entrance of the victim C located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.
2. Fraud and the Defendant in violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act: (a) around September 14:19, 2019, at the G convenience point of the victim’s operation in the name of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the following year from that date: (b) the Defendant, as described in paragraph (1), committed a stolen DNA bank’s credit card as if he had legitimate authority to finish the credit card; and (c) was provided by offering the above credit card to the employees of the convenience store in name, with goods equivalent to the total amount of KRW 18,00,00
9. Between August 1, 200, a total of 20 times as indicated in the annexed Table 1 list was provided by the victims by presenting the above credit card and settling the amount of 857,900 won.
Accordingly, the Defendant deceiving the above employees, etc., obtained by deceiving the above employees, etc. the total amount of 857,900 won from the above employees, etc., and used stolen credit cards.
3. On September 8, 2019, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud at the first convenience point of the victim’s operation in the name in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, as described in paragraph (1), that the Do Bank’s credit card, as described in paragraph (1), was carried out as if it had legitimate authority to complete the stolen C Bank’s credit card, and was provided to employees of the above convenience store with goods equivalent to the total market value of KRW 2,500 by presenting the above credit card, but the said credit card was not provided to the wind for which approval is refused. From that date to October 1 of the same year, the above credit card was not provided on 17 occasions in total as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Table 2.