Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 17 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 24, 2014, the Defendant has been issued a summary order of a fine of five million won or more at a governmental district court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

At around 01:42 on February 27, 2020, the Defendant was subject to the crackdown on drinking on the roads of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, by the background D belonging to C department of the Gangnam Police Station C and Police Officer E.

당시 피고인은 술에 취한 상태로 F 롤스로이스 고스트 차량을 운전하였다는 112신고가 접수되었으며, 경찰관 출동 당시 피고인이 위 차량 시동을 켠 채 운전석에서 자고 있었으며, 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 비틀거리는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할만한 상당한 이유가 있어 위 경찰공무원들로부터 약 10분 동안 3회에 걸쳐 호흡측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받고도 응하지 아니하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant refused to drive a drinking or to measure drinking more than twice.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods, as referred to in paragraph (1), destroyed the repair cost of KRW 77,390 by walking the front left-hand head-hand head-hand side of the vehicle G 2 G of the Gangnam Police Station, which was established at the same time during the process of arresting a flagrant offender by refusing to take a drinking test, to walk once the front left-hand head-hand side of the vehicle G 2 G of the Gangnam Police Station.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each investigation report (main driver's report on the state of his/her driving, attaching images refusing to measure, telephone conversations by a reporter), notification on the results of the drinking-driving control, collection video CD, and 112 report processing table;

1. Written estimate of repair costs and a certificate of vehicle repair;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports (Evidence No. 27 of the evidence list), investigation reports (verification of pending trials in the same kind of case, etc.);

1. Refusal of the measurement of alcohol under Article 148-2 (1), Article 44 (2), and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which applies mutatis mutandis to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;