Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 2, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Crime of Drinking Driving) from the Daegu District Court's Ansan Branch on November 2, 2006.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 12, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 14:25, the Defendant driven a E liquid sports vehicle in a drunken state with approximately 100 meters alcohol concentration of 0.185% at the section of approximately 100 meters from the C cafeteria, which is located in B while permanently residing, to the higher speed in D.

As a result, the Defendant violated the regulations on the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Criminal land, voluntary report on driving, report on the state of his/her oral statement, investigation report, report on the control of drinking driving, notification on the results of the control of drinking drivers, register of driver's licenses for motor vehicles, and next inquiry;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to criminal records, investigation reports (verification of suspect drinking records), and application of two copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant again committed the crime of drunk driving in this case despite the fact that he had been punished twice due to the same kind of crime, and that the defendant had a significant degree of taking away at the time of the instant case, is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment in excess of the fine, the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's occupation, age, character and behavior, environment, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined in accordance with the order.