Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the bicycle club like the victim B, and the defendant was supervised by the defendant, and the victim was in charge of the duties of general affairs.

1. The Defendant calls several times from February 2017 to April 2017 to C, who is a member of the said club, and there is a witness and informant who, around August 27, 2016, deemed that B and E have sexual intercourse with a new wall at a camping meeting located in Yangyang-gun, Gyeonggi-do around August 27, 2016, and did not deny the result of the direct verification to the relevant female member.

“The purpose of this is to impair the honor of the victim.”

2. On March 2017, the Defendant made several calls to F, a member of the foregoing club, and received information from F, “In the event of camping meetings, B and E on August 2016, 2016, that the Defendant had sexual intercourse inappropriate in the outdoor on the new wall, and two witnesses.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by the expression “......”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B, F, and C;

1. Complaint;

1. G statements;

1. Investigation report (person G telephone conversations with him);

1. Investigation report (the conversation of a wooden person H) and telephone communications;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (verification of G telephone from a witness);

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (1) of the same Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [The defendant and his defense counsel claim that each of the above remarks made by the defendant and his defense counsel is for the public interest, but according to the evidence, the following circumstances acknowledged as follows, namely, the contents of each of the above remarks relating to personal sexual life, although the members of the club during the club event were long, the contents of each of the above remarks were about personal sexual life, ② the defendant specifically transferred the above actions several times through private telephone, not the club meeting, etc., ③ The contents of each speech are merely explaining the above acts without disclosing witness, etc.