The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant returned to the police officer who was dispatched after receiving 112 reports by 112, stating that the Defendant left a married fighting team, and the police officer forced the Defendant to get her her her her her her her her flick belt and unable to get her her her her flick belt. This is an illegal performance of official duties, and even if the police officer took a her her blick and her bl

Nevertheless, the court below convicted the defendant by misunderstanding the facts.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the following facts are revealed: ① a male in front of the D restaurant was received 112 report of assaulting a female, and ② a male in front of the D restaurant was sent to the scene by a assistant F and policeman E who was on patrol duty at the time; ② a male in front of the D cafeteria was discovered that a male in front of the D cafeteria was at the time when the female in question, and the defendant was trying to keep the defendant away, and the assistant F and the defendant tried to see the defendant's wife while trying to take care of the defendant in order to isolate the defendant, ③ The defendant was in his or her superior, and the defendant was sent to the police station, and the defendant was sent to the police station, and it was recognized that the defendant was sealed with the chest of E at his or her will, and thus, the police officer and assistant F and she received a report of violence against a female in front of the D cafeteria and received a lawful report of his or her behavior to the defendant (the defendant's wife 12).

The defendant was called a match to police officers, and the defendant argued that the police officer's illegal suppression was prior to the defendant's act of suppression, because he flick flick flick flick, and flick flick flick flick flick flick flick.