beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;
2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
3.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a passenger car in B SP area.
On March 6, 2015, at around 20:50, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.117%, proceeded with the two-laned roads of D in front C while permanent residence, depending on one-lane from the place of dialogue wedding to the permanent urban bus terminal.
In this case, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in the driving of motor vehicles by accurately operating the steering gear and steering gear.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, while under the influence of alcohol and proceeded without proper prior to the front time, and received the part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle after the victim E (the 56-year-old taxi) driving in the signal atmosphere from the front time room, and led the said taxi to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the said taxi to be pushed down in the front time while driving the victim’s G driving in the signal atmosphere at the front time.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim E, such as climatic salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim I (the 54 years old), injured the victim I (the 22 years old), who was on the said taxi in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, injured the victim J (the 22 years old), injured the climatic salt, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of medical treatment, injured the victim K (the 47 years old), injured the victim K (the 47 years old), who was on the said climatic car in need of medical treatment for about three weeks of medical treatment, incurred injury to the victim L (the 68 years old), and did not immediately stop the climatic taxi owned by the victim to take measures equivalent to KRW 1,923,306 of repair cost, such as exchange of the pans, exchange of the pans, damage to the 1,327,858 won.