The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Around April 29, 1998, C, an employee of the Defendant in the case of 2012 Godan1098, violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by the road management authority in operating D vehicles on the front way of the crackdown on the violation of the restriction on the operation of d vehicles on the operation of d vehicles in the south-gu Mag-gu Mag-gu Mag-gu Magdong-gu Mag-si,

B. On May 5, 1998, E, an employee of the Defendant at 2012 Godan1101, violated the restrictions on the operation of vehicles by the road management authority in the operation of F vehicles on the front of F vehicles in front of the enzymal gymical fymals, which were on the part of the Defendant’s employee at 2012 Godan 110

C. Around November 10, 1997, G, an employee of the Defendant at 2012 Godan1104, violated the restriction on the operation of H vehicles by the road management authority in the operation of H vehicles on the front day of the zymal gymical gymical gymical gymical gymical gymical gymical gymical m

At around 08:00 on July 4, 1997, when I, an employee of the defendant in the 2012 Godan107 case, operated J vehicles on the side of the main steel company in the 1st place located in the Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Pohang-si, and violated the restriction of vehicle operation by the road management authority.

E. On June 14, 1997, K, an employee of the Defendant at 2012 Godan110, violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management authority in the operation of L vehicles on the front day of the eromatic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic eroscopic erosp

F. At around 04:03 on July 5, 1996, M, an employee of the Defendant in the case of 2012 Godan113, violated the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority in the course of operating NV on the eroposites in front of the examination site for vehicle control (7 national highways) located in the Southern-gu FFero-dong at port.

G. Around October 24, 1996, when an O, an employee of the Defendant in the case of 2012 Godan116, operated P vehicle on the front of the gymal fluent road located in the Nam-gu Sogdong, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seopo-si, on October 24, 1996, it violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management authority.

(h)..